Nomadic concepts

A heuristic tool for exchanging understandings of concepts across disciplinary, professional and cultural boundaries.

What is the nomadic concepts tool?

Nomadic concepts – also and perhaps better known as "travelling concepts" – are a heuristic tool and analytical practice for communicating across disciplinary, professional and cultural boundaries through discussing and opposing different understandings and uses of concepts such as identity, space or emotion. It could thus also be called a translation tool.
It was first proposed by Belgian philosopher of science Isabelle Stengers in her edited collection D’une science à l’autre: des concept nomades (1987) where she defines the purpose of concepts that travel between and within the ‚hard’ and ‚soft’ sciences as opening up debates and facilitating invention.

Later, it was Dutch narratologist Mieke Bal who in her book Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide (2002) described and indeed demonstrated how working with (and on) concepts in the humanities enables a thoroughly interdisciplinary and intersubjective approach.

Nomadic concepts at the intersection of various dimensions of humanities, cultural studies and social sciences
Nomadic concepts at the intersection of various dimensions of humanities, cultural studies and social sciences (Image: M. Rossini, http://blog.wbkolleg.unibe.ch/?p=1149)
×
Nomadic concepts at the intersection of various dimensions of humanities, cultural studies and social sciences
Nomadic concepts at the intersection of various dimensions of humanities, cultural studies and social sciences (Image: M. Rossini, http://blog.wbkolleg.unibe.ch/?p=1149)
Why should it be applied?

The nomadic concepts tool fosters a critical awareness about the potential and limits of a researcher’s disciplinary perspective and theorising. It sharpens her/his conceptual framework, allowing for both disciplinary and interdisciplinary rigour and quality. Understood as ‘mini-theories’ and semantic units in flux, such concepts facilitate exchange, mutual learning and co-development of novel questions and projects both across disciplines and involving non-academic knowledge production.

Following the understanding of concepts as having no fixed foundations but moving through various territories where they connect to diverse empirical contents and problems – as suggested by French philosopher Gilles Deleuze and psychoanalyst Félix Guattari (1991) –, this methodological practice is also a tool for (co-)creating new concepts. This leads not only to the production of basic knowledge (what a concept means in different disciplines) but to truly inter- and even transdisciplinary transformative knowledge (what a concept does and provokes in different disciplines or contexts), insofar as it leads to new understandings of phenomena and organises power relations in new ways.
When should it be applied? At the very beginning of an inter- or transdisciplinary encounter or group process and recursively throughout a research project, be it an individual (PhD thesis) or a larger one.
How does it work?

The following description is based on how the tool was put into practice at the Graduate School of the Humanities and the Social Sciences (GS@IASH: www.iash.unibe.ch):

1) The facilitator chooses one or several concepts. It/they should be relevant for the collective project and broad enough to be of more or less equal importance to investigations in the various disciplines represented in a project. Examples: memory, identity, emotion, narrative, performance, hegemony, intentionality, space, …

2) The participants form working groups around each of the concepts. Each working group is responsible for the organisation of a background input and a workshop centred around their concept. In preparation, the working group reads a number of texts that deal with the concept theoretically or apply the concept to a specific context. Among those, 2-3 core texts are chosen that offer points of entry and connection for all the participants.

3) An expert (e.g. the author of one of the core texts) provides the background input (e.g. a lecture) on a concept’s history, including a survey of the most important books and positions. S/he may also zoom in on her/his area of research connected to the chosen concept. Ample time should be made for discussion.

4) In the workshop, the participants discuss the texts in more detail to specify various understandings and uses of the concept.

5) Then, the members of the working group present their own work, i.e. their project contributions in relation to the concept (or argue why a concept is not relevant to their work or why a different yet possibly similar concept has more analytical power).

6) The expert and the peers give constructive feedback and make suggestions for further reading.

7) Ideally, the working group members immediately work that feedback into their project contributions and concentrate on the integration of knowledge around their chosen concept over the next few weeks/months.

8) It is recommended that the working groups meet regularly after the workshop as well and that the participants present their work in progress to each other in order to get an interdisciplinary ‘quality check’.
How are thought styles bridged? The concepts themselves provide the bridge: they have specific meanings and uses by each thought collective. Each participant carries the knowledge from other disciplinary, professional or cultural collectives back to her/his field where it may effect a change in the way a problem is perceived and analysed.
What’s the outcome? A broader conceptual apparatus for the framing of a problem and the production of more complex knowledge about it.
Who participates in what role? The method encourages “symmetrical learning” (Wolf Lepenies) from and with each other; i.e. mutual learning across hierarchies: Each participant is an expert in her/his field who brings disciplinary knowledge to the table and also does the integration of the ‘alien’ knowledge her/himself.
What do I need to prepare?

The facilitator needs to (1) identify one or several concepts that is of more or less equal importance to the participants; (2) coordinate the working group tasks, and (3) organise a room for the presentation(s) and workshop(s).

Participants need to read the suggested texts and prepare a presentation on the selected concept in relation to their work.
When not to use the method? The nomadic concepts tool was originally designed for a heterogeneous group of researchers. Researchers from the social sciences and the humanities are familiar with deliberating abstract concepts, other societal stakeholders might be less so.

Method

td-net toolbox – Nomadic concepts

Practical experiences

see

Profile provided by